
Breast implants may affect diagnosis of breast cancer, but not survivalMay 3rd, 2011NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Women with breast implants appear to have a higher false-negative mammography rate than the general population, according to data presented this week at the annual meeting of the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBS) in Washington, DC. These patients also present more often with palpable and node-positive disease than women without implants, the study shows. Yet there was no difference in cancer recurrence or 10-year survival. "The take-home message is that if a woman has implants and she's at elevated risk for breast cancer, MRI is suggested in addition tomammography," Dr. Sheldon Feldman, chief of breast surgery at Columbia University Medical Center in New York and chair of the society's publication committee, told Reuters Health. "I don't think the data are strong enough to make any statements about the prognosis," added Dr. Feldman, who was not involved in the new work. The findings are based on retrospective data on 195 breast cancer patients with breast augmentation and 4,810 without. Dr. Jessica Rayhanabad of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, and colleagues examined palpability, tumor size, nuclear grade, breast cancer-specific survival, and other factors in these patients. Prebiopsy mammography yielded a false-negative rate of 36% among the augmented patients, compared to only 15% in the general population, Dr. Rayhanabad's team found. One reason for the higher rate might be related to older augmentation methods. "People used to put the implant above the pectoral muscle," Dr. Rayhanabad told Reuters Health. "The actual mammogram was difficult to read. Now that they're putting the implants behind the pec, it's not as challenging to read the mammogram." But, she added, even new implants still present some difficulty during screening. In the study, 68% of the augmented patients had palpable cancers, compared to 52% of the patients in the control group (p = 0.001). In addition, 46% of the augmented group had node-positive cancer versus 33% of the control group (p = 0.005). It's possible that the implant pushes breast tissue from behind up against the skin, making cancers easier to palpate, Dr. Rayhanabad said. People who seek augmentation may also have less breast tissue, which could make it easier to detect the disease. She added that she was surprised to see that breast implants had no effect on cancer recurrence, breast-cancer-specific survival or overall survival. "I did expect to see a difference in the survival rate if there were more patients with node-positive diseases," Dr. Rayhanabad said, adding that a larger study might be needed to show an effect. By Rob Goodier
Last Updated: 2011-05-02 18:17:15 -0400 (Reuters Health) http://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=sup&sub=wom&pag=dis&ItemID=95125 |
Latest NewsASCO: Study finds breast self-exams, annual screening keySeptember 7th, 2011 September 7, 2011 -- Mammography and breast self-exams remain important tools for detecting breast cancer, even among women ages 40 to 49 -- for whom routine mammography has been questioned by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), according to a study to be presented this week at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Breast Cancer Symposium in San Francisco...Read More Benefit of mammograms even greater than thoughtJune 28th, 2011 June 28, 2011 -- CHICAGO (Reuters) - The longest-running breast cancer screening study ever conducted has shown that regular mammograms prevent deaths from breast cancer, and the number of lives saved increases over time, an international research team said on Tuesday...Read More |


